Accreditation

Arkansas State University maintains institutional accreditation through the Higher Learning Commission (HLC) and participates in a variety of specialized program accreditations and academic reviews.

This Knowledge Base book provides an overview of A-State’s accreditation landscape, including institutional memberships, external academic reviews, and program-level accreditations. It is designed to support faculty, staff, and external stakeholders in understanding the university’s commitment to academic quality and continuous improvement.

Higher Learning Commission (HLC)

Arkansas State University is accredited by the Higher Learning Commission (HLC), a regional accrediting agency recognized by the U.S. Department of Education. A-State has maintained continuous accreditation since it was first accredited in 1928.

Accreditation Pathway

A-State participates in the Open Pathway, a 10-year cycle that emphasizes both quality assurance and institutional improvement. This pathway includes:

The next comprehensive evaluation is scheduled for the 2023–2024 academic year.

Comprehensive Evaluation Components

The comprehensive HLC evaluation includes two major components:

  1. Assurance Argument
    A-State prepares a detailed report addressing the Five Criteria for Accreditation, supported by evidence. This process provides the university community with the opportunity to take a close look at its strengths and challenges for the future.

  2. On-Site Visit
    A team of HLC consultant-evaluators visits campus to verify the assurance argument and provide feedback for continued improvement.

Learn More

External Academic Reviews

Arkansas State University is committed to academic program excellence. All academic programs undergo regular external review, either through specialized accreditation or by expert consultants, to ensure quality, relevance, and continuous improvement.

External Academic Reviews

Overview of External Academic Reviews

Arkansas State University conducts external academic reviews to ensure program quality, relevance, and alignment with institutional and state priorities. These reviews are required by Arkansas Code §6-61-214 and administered by the Arkansas Higher Education Coordinating Board (AHECB).

The full details of Arkansas Code §6-61-214 are linked here:
Academic Program Review Policy
Academic Program Viability Policy

All certificate and degree programs must undergo review every 7 to 10 years, either through specialized accreditation or by external consultants.


Types of Program Review

Specialized Accredited Programs

➤ See: Specialized Accredited Programs

Non-Accredited Programs

➤ See: Program Review and Reporting


Planning and Communication

The Office of Accreditation and Assessment provides guidance and resources to support departments through the external review process. 

➤ Communication Protocols for Accredited Programs

➤ Internal Planning Timeline

➤ Program Site Visit Schedule

External Academic Reviews

Program Site Visit Schedule

All certificate and degree programs that are not program-specific, accredited/licensed/state-certified will be reviewed by external consultants every 7-10 years. The following information provides the academic year in which each non-program-specific accredited/licensed/state-certified program will have an expert consultant visit the A-State campus:

2022-2023

Award

Program Name

AS

Technology

BA

Chemistry

BA

Environmental Studies

BA

Economics

BS

Technology

BS

Biological Sciences (all emphases)

BS

Biotechnology

BS

Chemistry

BS

Environmental Science

BS

Physics

BS

Wildlife, Fisheries, and Conservation

BSA

Agricultural Studies

BSA

Agriculture Business; also at ASUB

BSA

Animal Science

BSA

Plant & Soil Science

MA

Biological Sciences

MS

Biology

MS

Chemistry

MSA

Agriculture

MSE

Biology

MSE

Chemistry

PSC

Biotechnology

2023-2024

Award

Program Name

BA

Criminology; also at ASUB, ASUMH, EACC, ANC, MSCC, ASUN

BA

English

BA

Philosophy

BA

Sociology; also at ANC

CP

Spanish for Professions

BA

World Languages & Cultures

BS

Health Studies

MA

Criminal Justice

MA

English

MA

Sociology

MSE

English

2024-2025

Award

Program Name

AAS

Paramedic

AGS

General Studies

AS

General Education

CP

Nonprofit Communication

CP

Neuropsychological Testing

BA

Communication Studies

BA

Computer Science

BAS

Organizational Supervision

BGS

General Studies

BS

Exercise Science

BS

Health Promotion

BS

Psychology

BS

Strategic Communications

BS

Computer Science

BS

Mathematics

BS

Interdisciplinary Studies

BSCE

Civil Engineering

BSEE

Electrical Engineering

BSME

Mechanical Engineering

CP

Social Media Management

CP

Professional Leadership

GC

Health Communication

GC

Cyber Security

GC

Data Science

GC

High Performance Computing

GC

Computer Science Education

MA

Communication Studies

MS

Strategic Communication

MS

Exercise Science

MS

Psychological Science

MS

Computer Science

MS

Mathematics

MSE

Mathematics

MSE

Computer Science Education

MSE

Physical Education 

2025-2026

Award

Program Name

CP 

Digital Humanities

BA

History

BA

Political Science

EdD

Educational Leadership

GC

History

MA

History

MA

Political Science

MS

College Student Personnel Services

MS

Early Childhood Services

MSE

Social Science

2026-2027

Award

Program Name

MCD Communicative Disorders

2027-2028

Award

Program Name

BS

Digital Innovations

CP

Swift Coding

2028-2029

Award

Program Name

BA Music
BM Music
MM Music - Performance
MME Music Education

2029-2030

Award

Program Name

MA Heritage Studies
PhD Heritage Studies
MS Environmental Sciences
MS Molecular Biosciences
PhD Environmental Sciences
PhD Molecular Sciences

2030-2031

Award

Program Name

BS

Communication Sciences & Disorders

BS

Creative Multimedia Production

MS

Media Management

MSMC

Journalism

MSMC

Radio-Television 

2031-2032

Award

Program Name

MSE

Early Childhood Education

MSE

Educational Theory & Practice, (National Board Certification Track, offered via distance); also at AL, KS, TN, TX

MEM 

Engineering Management

MSE 

Engineering

External Academic Reviews

Communication Protocols for Accredited Programs

Guidance for Coordinating Programmatic Accreditation Reviews

The Office of Accreditation and Assessment provides guidance and resources to support departments through the external review process for accredited, licensed, or state-certified programs. The following process outlines communication process programs should have with the Provost office regarding programmatic accreditation. Each section is intended for each possible stage of programmatic accreditation. Programs are highly encouraged to use consultants to review the self-study report draft, prepare for the site visit, or provide general advice on the accreditation process.


Planning Timeline Worksheet

Programs are required to submit a timeline 360 days in advance of the self-study submission deadline that outlines key milestones for document development, consultant coordination, and site visit preparation. This worksheet helps departments plan and track those steps in alignment with ADHE and institutional expectations.

Attached Document: Programmatic Accreditation Timeline Worksheet (DOCX)

Use this worksheet to:


Candidacy and Initial Accreditation

  1. Curriculum Forms for new programs and reconfigured programs includes information regarding the timeline for candidacy and initial accreditation.
  2. Programs will submit a timeline 360 days in advance of the self-study submission deadline that outlines the milestones for developing and submitting all documents and self-study reports to the accreditor, Provost, Provost’s Executive Assistant, and Assistant Vice Chancellor for Assessment and Accreditation (see Planning Timeline Worksheet).
  3. The following applications, forms, and/or reports must be submitted to the Provost, Provost’s Executive Assistant, and Assistant Vice Chancellor for Assessment and Accreditation at least 30 days in advance of submission to programmatic accreditor:
    1. All candidacy and initial accreditation applications (after program/curriculum proposal forms are approved)
    2. Initial accreditation self-study or log-in to assurance argument system
    3. A two-page summary of the strengths and potential concerns of the program based on the self-study analysis and report
  4. Within 30 days of the site visit, the self-study director, program director, department chair, associate dean, and dean will meet with the Provost and Assistant Vice Chancellor for Assessment and Accreditation to review the accreditation process. This meeting should include a short presentation with the following information: review of accreditation process, expectations for the site visit, self-study highlights, strengths and potential concerns, and anticipated questions during the visit.
  5. Site visit agenda must be provided to the Provost, Provost’s Executive Assistant, and Assistant Vice Chancellor for Assessment and Accreditation at least 14 days prior to site team arrival and must include the following:
    1. At least one meeting, preferably the exit meeting, with the Provost and Assistant Vice Chancellor for Assessment and Accreditation
    2. In the event the Provost or Assistant Vice Chancellor for Assessment and Accreditation cannot attend the meeting, the Sr. Associate Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs will attend
  6. Any rejoinder or confirmation of fact correspondence after the site visit must be submitted to the Provost, Provost’s Executive Assistant, and Assistant Vice Chancellor for Assessment and Accreditation within 14 days of the deadline set by the accreditor.
  7. All email correspondence between accreditor and program after the site visit and before the final accreditor decision regarding rejoinder and/or confirmation of fact must include the Provost, Provost’s Executive Assistant, and Assistant Vice Chancellor for Assessment and Accreditation
  8. Team report, team recommendations, and accreditation affirmation letters must be sent to the Provost, Provost’s Executive Assistant, and Assistant Vice Chancellor for Assessment and Accreditation within 14 days of receipt

Reaffirmation of Accreditation

  1. Programs will submit a timeline 360 days in advance of the self-study submission deadline that outlines the milestones for developing and submitting all documents and self-study reports to the accreditor, Provost, Provost’s Executive Assistant, and Assistant Vice Chancellor for Assessment and Accreditation (template will be provided).
  2. The following must be submitted to the Provost, Provost’s Executive Assistant, and Assistant Vice Chancellor for Assessment and Accreditation at least 30 days in advance of submission to programmatic accreditor:
    1. Accreditation self-study or log-in to assurance argument system
    2. A two-page summary of the strengths and potential concerns of the program based on the self-study analysis and report
  3. Within 30 days of the site visit, the self-study director, program director, department chair, associate dean, and dean will meet with the Provost and Assistant Vice Chancellor for Assessment and Accreditation to review the accreditation process. This meeting should include a short presentation with the following information: review of accreditation process, expectations for the site visit, self-study highlights, strengths and potential concerns, and anticipated questions during the visit.
  4. Site visit agenda must be provided to the Provost, Provost’s Executive Assistant, and Assistant Vice Chancellor for Assessment and Accreditation at least 14 days prior to site team arrival and must include the following:
    1. At least one meeting, preferably the exit meeting, with the Provost and Assistant Vice Chancellor for Assessment and Accreditation
    2. In the event the Provost or ASSISSTANT VICE CHANCELLOR for Assessment and Accreditation cannot attend the meeting, the Sr. Associate Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs will attend
  5. Any rejoinder or confirmation of fact correspondence after the site visit must be submitted to the Provost, Provost’s Executive Assistant, and Assistant Vice Chancellor for Assessment and Accreditation within two weeks of the deadline set by the accreditor.
  6. All email correspondence between accreditor and program after the site visit and before the final accreditor decision regarding rejoinder and/or confirmation of fact must include the Provost, Provost’s Executive Assistant, and Assistant Vice Chancellor for Assessment and Accreditation
  7. Team report, team recommendations, and accreditation reaffirmation letters must be sent to the Provost, Provost’s Executive Assistant, and Assistant Vice Chancellor for Assessment and Accreditation within 14 days of receipt

Post Hoc Process: Interim Monitoring1

  1. In the event the programmatic accreditor requires interim monitoring of any type (report or focus visit), the following must be delivered to the Provost, Provost’s Executive Assistant, and Assistant Vice Chancellor for Assessment and Accreditation at least 30 days in advance of the programmatic accreditor’s deadline:
    1. Interim report or log-in to assurance argument system
    2. A two-page summary of the strengths and potential concerns of the program based on the follow-up improvements required for the interim report
  2. If there is a focus visit, the site visit agenda must be provided to the Provost, Provost’s Executive Assistant, and Assistant Vice Chancellor for Assessment and Accreditation at least 14 days prior to site team arrival and must include the following:
    1. At least one meeting, preferably the exit meeting, with the Provost and Assistant Vice Chancellor for Assessment and Accreditation
    2. In the event the Provost or Assistant Vice Chancellor for Assessment and Accreditation cannot attend the meeting, the Sr. Associate Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs will attend
  3. Interim report or site visit review letters must be sent to the Provost, Provost’s Executive Assistant, and Assistant Vice Chancellor for Assessment and Accreditation within two weeks of receipt

1 Programmatic accreditation nomenclature varies from accreditor-to-accreditor. In some instances, particularly in health professions and public administration, the accreditor requires annual routine reports that are called “interim reports.” These types of routine interim reports are not subject to AAR review as discussed here. Interim monitoring in this context is related to addressing deficiencies in meeting the accreditor’s standards or criterion. Additionally, some accreditors require clinical site endorsements. This, too, is an exception to the formal communication process outlined in this document. The Provost and AAR are always willing to assist when needed with these types of reports and endorsements though. Please keep in close contact with the respective Dean and reach out to AAR for assistance when needed.


Post Hoc Process: Recommendations for Next Reaffirmation

  1. In the event the programmatic accreditor makes recommendations for the next reaffirmation, programs are required to make a progress report to the Provost and Assistant Vice Chancellor for Assessment and Accreditation one year from receipt of the team report and official accreditation letter.
    1. If curriculum is mentioned, the Sr. Associate Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs should be contacted immediately to begin the curriculum revision process and necessary proposals
    2. If retention is mentioned, the Associate Vice Chancellor for Student Retention should be consulted
    3. If student-learning assessment is mentioned, the Assistant Vice Chancellor for Assessment and Accreditation should be consulted and assessment plans adapted to the accreditor’s recommendations
    4. If hiring new faculty and/or staff is recommended, the Dean and Provost should begin making the necessary hiring arrangements
    5. All other possible recommendations should be discussed with the appropriate department (i.e. Facilities Management; internship sites; preceptors; etc.)

Notes

This communication process may be altered to fit the accreditor’s processes when appropriate. However, the Provost Office must have clear communication and a reasonable amount of time to review self-study reports, rejoinder or confirmation of fact correspondence, interim monitoring reports, and/or site visit meeting requests.

External Academic Reviews

Specialized Accreditations

This page provides a comprehensive list of academic accreditations and campus endorsements. These specialized accreditations reflect Arkansas State University’s commitment to academic excellence and compliance with professional standards across a wide range of disciplines.

Arkansas State University is accredited by the regional institutional accreditor, the Higher Learning Commission. Individual programs are then accredited by specialized accrediting agencies for the respective programs. 


Specialized Accrediting Agencies

These accrediting organizations set the academic standards by which their member institutions must comply. 


College of Business

Accreditor: The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business – International (AACSB)
Accredited Degrees:


College of Education and Behavioral Science

Accreditor: Association for Play Therapy (APT)
Accredited Degrees:

Accreditor: Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs (CACREP)
Accredited Degrees:

Accreditor: Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP)
Accredited Degrees:

Accreditor: Commission on Sport Management Accreditation (COSMA)
Accredited Degrees:

Accreditor: National Association of School Psychologists (NASP)
Accredited Degrees:


College of Engineering and Computer Science

Accreditor: ABET – Engineering Accreditation Commission
Accredited Degrees:


College of Liberal Arts & Communication

Accreditor: National Association of Schools of Art and Design (NASAD)
Accredited Degrees:

Accreditor: National Association of Schools of Music (NASM)
Accredited Degrees:

Accreditor: National Association of Schools of Theatre (NAST)
Accredited Degrees:

Application in Process:

Accreditor: Accrediting Council on Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (ACEJMC)
Accredited Degrees:

Accreditor: Network of Schools of Public Policy, Affairs, and Administration (NASPAA)
Accredited Degrees:


College of Nursing & Health Professions

Accreditor: Accreditation Commission for Education in Nursing (ACEN)
Accredited Degrees:

Accreditor: Council on Accreditation of Nurse Anesthesia Educational Programs (COA)
Accredited Degrees:

Accreditor: Commission on Accreditation of Athletic Training Education (CAATE)
Accredited Degrees:

Accreditor: Commission on Accreditation in Physical Therapy Education (CAPTE)
Accredited Degrees:

Accreditor: Accreditation Council for Occupational Therapy Education (ACOTE)
Accredited Degrees:

Accreditor: National Accrediting Agency for Clinical Laboratory Sciences (NAACLS)
Accredited Degrees:

Accreditor: Commission on Accreditation of Allied Health Education Programs (CAAHEP)
Accredited Degrees:

Accreditor: Joint Review Committee on Education in Radiologic Technology (JRCERT)
Accredited Degrees:

Accreditor: Council on Academic Accreditation in Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology (ASHA/CAA)
Accredited Degrees:

Accreditor: Council on Social Work Education (CSWE)
Accredited Degrees:

Accreditor: Accreditation Council for Education in Nutrition and Dietetics (ACEND)
Accredited Degrees:

Accreditor: Council for the Accreditation of Emergency Management and Homeland Security Education (CAEMHSE)
Accredited Degrees:

Accreditor: Committee on Accreditation of Educational Programs for the Emergency Medical Services Professions (CoAEMSP)

Accredited Degrees:

Application in Process (Status: Letter of Review):

Accreditor: American Diabetes Association
Accredited Degrees:

Accreditor: Arkansas Department of Health Emergency Medical Services
Accredited Degrees:


College of Sciences & Mathematics

Accreditor: American Chemical Society (ACS)
Accredited Degrees:


University College

Accreditor: National Alliance of Concurrent Enrollment Partnerships (NACEP)
Accredited Program:


ASU Museum

Accreditor: American Association of Museums (AAM)


International Center for English

Accreditor: Commission on English Language Program Accreditation (CEA)
Accredited Program:


Facilities Management

Accreditor: APPA (Association of Physical Plant Administrators) - Leadership in Educational Facilities
Recognition:


University Police Department

Accreditor: Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies (CALEA)

 

 

 

Institutional Memberships

Arkansas State University holds institutional membership in a wide range of agencies, councils, and organizations that support the quality and advancement of its academic programs. These memberships reflect A-State’s commitment to academic excellence, professional engagement, and continuous improvement across disciplines.

Major Institutional Memberships

American Assembly of Collegiate Schools of Business
American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education
American Association of Colleges of Nursing
American Association of State Colleges and Universities
American Association of State Colleges of Agriculture and Renewable Resources
American Mathematical Society
American Occupational Therapy Association
American Physical Therapy Association Central ACCE Consortia (MO, KS, OK, AR)
American Society for Engineering Education
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Arkansas Academy of Science
Arkansas Council for Women in Higher Education
Arkansas Institutional Research Organization
Arkansas Research Alliance
Association for University Business and Economic Research
Association of American Colleges and Universities
Association of Public & Land-Grant Universities
Association of Schools of Allied Health Professions
Association of College Educators in Radiologic Technology
Association of Schools of Advancing Health Professions
Association of Schools of Journalism and Mass Communications
Broadcast Education Association
College Reading and Learning Association
Commission on Accreditation of Allied Health Education Programs
Commission on Accreditation of Athletic Training Education
Commission on Sport Management Accreditation
Conference of Southern Graduate Schools
Council for Accreditation of Educator Preparation
Council for Advancement and Support of Education
Council of Colleges of Arts & Sciences
Council of Graduate Schools
Council on Social Work Education
Council on Undergraduate Research
European Teacher Education Network
International Registry of Counsellor Education Programs (Founding Member)
International Student Exchange
Jonesboro Unlimited
National Association of College and University Business Officers
National Association of Colleges and University Attorneys
National Association of Fellowships Advisors
National Association of Schools of Art and Design
National Association of Schools of Music
National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration
National Collegiate Honors Council
National Council on Rehabilitation Education
National League for Nursing
National Student Exchange
Non-land-grant Agricultural and Renewable Resources Universities
North Central Association of Colleges and Schools
Oak Ridge Associated Universities
Southern Council on Collegiate Education for Nursing
Southern Regional Education Board
Teacher Education Council of State Colleges and Universities
American Chemical Society


Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU)

Since 2004, Arkansas State University has been a member of Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU), a consortium of more than 120 colleges and universities that partners with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). ORAU connects students and faculty with research opportunities at federal laboratories and promotes collaboration among member institutions.

Through the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE), the DOE facility that ORAU operates, A-State students and faculty have access to:

A comprehensive listing of these programs and other opportunities, their disciplines, and details on locations and benefits can be found in the ORISE Catalog of Education and Training Programs. Appointment and program lengths range from one month to four years.

ORAU's Office of Partnership Development also seeks opportunities for partnerships and alliances among ORAU's members, private industry, and major federal facilities. Activities include:

For more information, visit the ORAU Home Page.