Skip to main content

4.3 Cybersecurity Incident Response Plan

Effective Date: September 17, 2025 
Revised Date: OctoberJune 20,29, 20252026 
Responsible Office: Information Technology Services (ITS)
Contact: ITS Security Panel – security@AState.edu | ITS Help Desk – (870) 972-3033

1. Preface

This document and its contents exist to manage and respond to cybersecurity incidents only. Anyone suspecting an exposure of university data or systems should immediately contact:  

  • IT Support Services (Help Desk): 870-972-3933 
  • IT Security Team: security@astate.edu or 870-680-3770 

If you are experiencing a non-cybersecurity related security incident and need immediate support, please contact:  

University Police Department (UPD): 870-972-2093 (24/7 Dispatch) 


2. Purpose

TheThis purposecybersecurity ofincident thisresponse plan is to establish a structured Incident Response Plan (IRP) frameworkprovides fora identifying,comprehensive respondingoverview to,of how Information Technology Services (ITS) staff respond to and recoveringrecover from informationidentified securitycybersecurity incidents atimpacting Arkansas State University.University TheJonesboro plan(A-State). This IRP identifies and clearly establishes responsibilities during cybersecurity incidents, outlines generic response steps, and ensures timely response, minimizes disruption to university operations, protects institutional data and assets,infrastructure andis supportsadequately complianceprotected withduring applicablea lawstrue andincident. regulations.


2.3. Scope

This IRP applies to all Informationdata, Technologypersonnel, Servicesassets, (ITS)information staffmanagement at Arkansas State University, including Security, Networking, Systems, Infrastructure, Hardware Services, Help Desk,systems, and Cardtechnology Centerresources units.under Thesethe groupsresponsibility areof directlyITS. responsibleWhere forapplicable, executingspecific security incident response actionsplan specifics will not be covered as outlinedtheir inresponsibility thisor plan.impact lay outside of ITS and may not be considered a “cybersecurity” incident (e.g., active shooter incident).  

TheThis plan also extends to certain members of university leadership andoutside supportingof functions – including the CIO, CISO, Executive LeadershipITS (Chancellor’se.g., Cabinet),Chancellors Cabinet, General Counsel, University Communications, and Risk Management – roles are defined in Section 5.Communications). Where applicable, the Arkansas State University Police Department (UPD) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI – Jonesboro Cyber Task Force) will be involved.

 

Third-party vendors and service providers with access to university systems or data are expected to cooperate fully with ITS, in incident investigation, containment, and remediation activities, and may be required to meet contractual or regulatory obligations (e.g., breach notifications, forensic reporting).


3.4. General PrinciplesDefinitions

ITS has the following general principles related to this IRP:

  • IncidentsCybersecurity mustIncident be- reportedAn immediatelyoccurrence that— (“IfA) inactually doubt,or reportimminently it”).jeopardizes, without lawful authority, the integrity, confidentiality, or availability of information or an information system; or (B) constitutes a violation or imminent threat of violation of law, security policies, security procedures, or acceptable use policies. 
  • ContainmentSecurity Panel – The individuals responsible for investigating data breaches or other cybersecurity incidents. This panel is comprised of all members of the ITS Senior Leadership and evidencesenior preservationmembers precedeof recoverythe actions.IT Security team.  
  • AllIncident responsesResponse mustCoordinator– followThe chain-of-commandtechnical authoritylead asof outlinedthe incident response process. Authorizes next steps, including emergency containment actions, and works to ensure adequate resources are made available to other technical staff working on the incident. Ensures the executive lead is adequately informed, and that incident response actions are minimally disruptive to the operations of A-State.  
  • Executive Response Coordinator– The individual responsible for coordinating with university leadership outside of ITS. Provides adequate and timely updates to key stakeholders and works to ensure adequate resources are made available to the security panel in the Rolespursuit &of Responsibilitiesincident section.
  • Documentationresponse and lessonsremediation.  learned are mandatory for every incident.
  • Compliance with applicable laws (FERPA, HIPAA, GLBA, PCI, state/federal breach laws) is required.

4.5. Incident Response Plan (IRP) ProceduresResponsibilities

TheAll following steps are designed to ensure incidents are identified, assessed, contained, eradicated, and resolved in a timely and coordinated manner, while preserving evidence, maintaining compliance with regulatory requirements, and minimizing disruption to university operations.

  1. Report the incident immediately.

    The person who discovers the incident will notify the ITS Security Panel (see Appendix A for contacts), email security@astate.edu, contact the ITS front desk at 870-972-3033, or after normal business hours call 870-253-8184. If in doubt, report it.

  2. Initial notification & logging (by first panel member reached).

    Notify the ITS Security Panel and appropriate staff using WebEx/Teams/phone; use email only as backup (email may be part of the compromise). Log initial details on the IT Security Incident Report (Appendix B).

  3. Initial assessment (by Security Panel).

    Meet or confer via phone, Microsoft Teams, or WebEx to evaluate status and immediate needs addressing the following questions to gain further insight into the incident:

    • Is the incident still in progress? If yes, take immediate containment action to disconnect or isolate the incident.
    • What data/property is threatened/compromised, and how critical is it?
    • What is/was the impact if the attack succeeds or has succeeded (minimal, serious, or critical)?
    • What system(s) are targeted, and where are they located (physical/network)?
    • Are regulated/sensitive datapersonnel involved (e.g. FERPA, HIPAA, GLBA, PCI, sponsored research)?
    • Are third-party vendors/cloud systems impacted? (open vendor ticket/escalation if so)

  4. Categorize the incident (highest applicable level).
    The incident will be categorized into the highest applicable level of one of the following categories:

    • Category one (Data Breach/Confidentiality Compromise)
      Unauthorized access, disclosure, or exfiltration of sensitive or regulated information (FERPA, HIPAA, GLBA, PCI, PII, research data).

      Examples:
      • Ransomware
      • Database intrusion
      • Stolen credentials used to access Banner
      • Exposure of SSNs in files

    • Category two (System Integrity Compromise)
      Malicious activity that undermines the trustworthiness or normal function of university systems.

      Examples:
      • Localized ransomware detected and contained before propagation or data exposure.
      • Malware infection
      • Website defacement
      • Rootkit installation

    • Category three (Service Availability Disruption)
      Denial or degradation of critical IT services.

      Examples:
      • DDoS attack on campus internet
      • LMS/email outage
      • Server crash from attack

    • Category four (Policy/Compliance Violation or Suspicious Activity)
      Incidents that do not rise to the level of breach/system compromise, but indicate misuse, non-compliance, or attempted attack requiring investigation.

      Examples:
      • Phishing attempts
      • Repeated failed logins
      • Unauthorized software installation
      • Use of unapproved cloud storage

        Routine Category Four events (e.g., single compromised accounts, isolated phishing attempts, or minor compliance violations) do not require a full invocation of the Incident Response Plan (IRP).

        These events should still be:
      • Documented via an Incident Response Form.
      • Reported to the Security Panel for awareness, tracking, and trend analysis.

        Escalation criteria: If the incident escalates in scale, impact, or regulatory risk the incident should be re-classified into the highest applicable category (Category 1 - 3) and the full IRP should be triggered.

  5. Legal & compliance notifications.
    If PII or regulated data may be involved, notify University Legal Counsel for statutory notification guidance. The CIO (or CIO’s designee) will coordinate with Legal and University Communications for mandatory notices (state legislative audit/federal law; FERPA, HIPAA, PCI; GDPR if applicable).

  6. Law Enforcement & External notifications.

    The Incident Response Lead, in consultation with the CIO and Legal Counsel, must determine whether an incident meets the criteria for mandatory law-enforcement notification.

    Notify law enforcement (UPD and FBI) within 60 minutes when any of the following apply:

    • Confirmed or suspected criminal activity (unauthorized intrusion, data exfiltration, extortion, or ransomware).
    • Significant sensitive or regulated data exposure (FERPA, HIPAA, GLBA, PCI, CJIS, PII).
    • Evidence of credential theft or account takeover at scale.
    • Significant financial loss or fraud (e.g., business email compromise).
    • Threats to life/safety or potential national-security implications.

    Contact order (phone preferred; do not use email):

    • University Police Department (UPD): 870-972-2093 – establish a campus case number, coordinate chain-of-custody, and initiate contact with local/federal agencies.
    • FBI – Jonesboro Resident Agency (Cyber Task Force): 870-932-0700 — engage for coordination on active intrusion, ransomware, or data-theft cases.
    • Jonesboro Police Department (as directed by UPD): 870-935-5551.

    All notifications must be documented in Appendix B, Section 6 (Notification & Communications).

  7. Containment & Evidence Preservation (Before Changes).

    Based on the assessment, follow the appropriate procedure/runbook (see Incident Response Procedures/Contact List). Prioritize isolation/containment to limit spread.

    • Preserve evidence (volatile and at-rest) and maintain chain of custody with UPD if needed.
    • Capture memory/volatile data where feasible before shutdown/rebuild.
    • Do not alter systems beyond what is required for containment without forensics and executive leadership approval.
    • When law enforcement involvement is triggered; the CISO/Incident Lead must coordinate with UPD to establish an evidence chain-of-custody. All evidence transfers to UPD or FBI must be logged (see Appendix B, §5), sealed, and hashed for integrity verification.

  8. Forensics and Root Cause

    Authorized team members will use forensic techniques (log review, sensor/IDS data, imaging, interviews) to determine cause, scope, dwell time, and affected assets. Log all forensics activity; preserve evidence per chain-of-custody requirements. Recommend specific preventive changes. Approved third-party vendors may be utilized to support forensic analysis.

  9. Eradication & Recovery (Authorization Required)
    With CIO (or CIO’s designee) approval, proceed to eradication and recovery:
    • Rebuild/re-image affected systems and restore data from clean backups as necessary.
    • Require password resets where credential compromise is possible.
    • Harden systems (remove/disable unused services).
    • Apply current patches/updates.
    • Ensure real-time malware protection/EDR and network IDS are active.
    • Verify logging is enabled at appropriate levels and forwarding to central SIEM.
    • Validate clean state (scans, EDR health, integrity checks) before returning to full service.

  10. Documentation
    The following shall be documented and filed with the CIO (or CIO’s designee) (see Incident Identification form):
    • How the incident was discovered.
    • The category of the incident.
    • Initial attack vector (e.g., email, web, RDP, vendor) - How the incident occurred, whether through email, firewall, etc.
    • Origin indicators (IPs, accounts, domains, TTPs, IOCs) - Where the attack came from, such as IP addresses and other related information about the attacker.
    • Response actions taken and by whom.
    • Effectiveness of actions and residual risk.

  11. Evidence Retention
    Copies of logs, emails, images, and other records will be retained as evidence for as long as necessary to complete investigation and any legal proceedings, including appeals, per Arkansas State University’s records retention policy and legal guidance.

  12. Impact & Cost Assessment
    Assess organizational impact and estimate direct and indirect costs (containment, recovery, vendor services, lost productivity, reputational impact, student/faculty disruption).

  13. Lessons Learned & Procedure Updates
    Within 30 days of incident closure, conduct a formal post-incident review. Update procedures, controls, and training. Track and assign actions to owners with due dates.

  14. Communications & Follow-Up Plan
    Determine required announcements, audiences (executives, IT staff, campus community), frequency, timeline, and responsible owner. Use approved communications templates as provided by Chief Communications Officer and retain copies in the incident record.

  15. Closure
    Review the Incident Post-Review Checklist (Section 6) and file with the CIO (or CIO’s designee). Ensure all assigned remediation items are tracked to completion.

5. Roles, Responsibility, and Authority

Effectivecybersecurity incident response requires clear roles, responsibilities, and decision-making authority.process. This sectionincludes: defines the responsibilities and authority of the CIO, CISO/Incident Response Lead, the ITS Security Panel, Executive Leadership, Legal Counsel, University Communications, Risk Management (and UPD/FBI where applicable) to ensure coordinated and efficient response to IT security incidents.

5.1
  • Chief Information Officer (CIO)

Responsibilities

-
  • Provides overall leadershipResponsible for Informationthe Technologyexecutive Servicessponsorship, governance, and ensures alignmentoversight of the University’s incident response withprocesses institutionalwithin goals.
  • the
  • Approvesscope of this plan. Ensures that applicable regulatory, statutory, and enforcescontractual theobligations Incidentare Responseidentified, Plantranslated (IRP)into actionable controls, and relatedoperationalized policies.
  • across
  • Provides direction during major security incidents and authorizes significant actions (e.g., full system shutdown, network isolation).
  • Ensures resources (staff, budget, vendor support) are available to manage incidents effectively.

Authority

  • Final authority on IT decisions impacting critical universityinstitutional systems and infrastructure.
  • processes.
  • CanServes delegate operational authority toas the CISO,executive AVCresponse ofcoordinator IT Systems, Networking & IT Support or Incident Response Lead during activeany incidents.
  • true-positive
  • Collaboratescybersecurity withincident. Executive Leadership (Chancellor’s Cabinet) and Legal Counsel to guide strategic response efforts.
5.2
Chief
Information
Security
Officer
    (CISO) /
  • Director of IT Security /– IncidentResponsible Responsefor Leadthe

    Responsibilities

    management
      of
    • A-State's information security program and oversight of the IT security team. Serves as a member of the security panel and generally as the incident response coordinator during any true-positive cybersecurity incident. Depending on the circumstances of any true-positive incident, other individuals on the security panel may serve as the incident leadresponse duringcoordinator. IT security incidents.
    • Directs
    all
phases
of incident response: detection, assessment, containment, eradication, recovery, and closure.
  • Coordinates with the IT Security Department,Team Networking,– Systems,Responsible Hardwarefor Services,confirming the validity of reported or alerted cybersecurity incidents. Notifies the security panel upon confirmation of a true positive incident or when an incident cannot be confirmed as false-positive. Provides accurate working data to technical staff and Help Desk teamshelps to execute response actions.
  • Provides regular status updates to CIO, Executive Leadership, and Legal Counsel where applicable.
  • Ensures after-action reviews and updates to the IRP.

Authority

  • Authorized to initiate containment measures to limit damage (e.g., disconnect systems, block accounts).
  • May escalate incidents to CIO, Legal Counsel, University Communications, or law enforcement where applicable.
  • Can request vendor/third-party support for forensic investigation or remediation.
5.3 ITS Security Panel (Security, Networking, Systems, Hardware Services, Help Desk, Card Center)

Responsibilities

  • Serves as the central operational body for IT security incident response underactions. direction
  • Security Panel – Responsible for coordinating technical staff as needed to complete remedial actions during the incident response. Assists with documenting all actions taken and for assisting as necessary with campus coordination.  
  • Technical Staff – Responsible for gathering data from information systems, providing expertise and guidance in technical platforms, the execution of directed remedial actions, and completing adequate documentation of all remedial actions taken at the direction of the CISO/Incidentsecurity Responsepanel. Lead.
  •  
  • Coordinates across Security, Networking, Systems, Hardware Services, Help Desk, and Card Center units to ensure rapid containment, eradication, and recovery.
  • Receives incident reports (via Help Desk or Security Panel e-mail – securitypanel@astate.edu) and ensures they are logged and escalated.
  • Preserves evidence, maintains chain of custody, and supports forensic analysis and investigation.
  • Provides system/network/application data as needed for root cause analysis.
  • Implements recovery actions and validates clean state before services return to full service.
  • Manages identity and access-related response measures (e.g., disabling accounts, issuing new credentials, reissuing ID cards via Card Center).
  • Recommends procedural, technical, or policy changes based on lessons learned.

Authority

  • Authorized to take immediate containment measures (e.g., disabling accounts, quarantining endpoints, blocking network traffic, card deactivation).
  • Executes recovery actions (system rebuilds, access resets, card replacements) as directed by the Incident Response Lead.
  • Cannot independently close incidents or restore systems without CISO/Incident Lead approval.
5.4 Executive Leadership (Chancellor’s Cabinet)

Responsibilities

  • Provides institutional leadership and decision-making for incidents affecting university operations.
  • Reviews and approves significant security standards or procedural changes recommended by ITS. Policies have to be approved via Board of Trustees.
  • Allocates emergency resources (funding, personnel, vendor support) as needed for incident response.

Authority

  • Holds final authority on institutional risk and operational decisions.
  • Directs university-wide communications and public relations strategies during major incidents.

Responsibilities

  • Advises on legal, regulatory, and compliance obligations (FERPA, HIPAA, GLBA, state/federal breach laws).
  • Determines requirements for breach notifications to affected individuals or regulatory bodies.
  • Provides legal risk assessments and advises on litigation or regulatory exposure.

Authority

  • Authorized to determine the legal requirements for handling breaches and notifications.
  • May coordinate with law enforcement or third-party investigators.
  • Does not override or delay containment and technical response efforts.
5.6 University Communications/Marketing

Responsibilities

  • Manages internal and external communication strategies during and after incidents.
  • Ensures timely and accurate dissemination of information to students, faculty, staff, and the public.
  • Prepares public statements in coordination with Executive Leadership and Legal Counsel.
  • Supports Help Desk with consistent messaging to impacted users where applicable.

Authority

  • Authorized to coordinate media responses and public statements.
  • Collaborates with Executive Leadership, Legal Counsel, and IT leadership to ensure accurate, compliant messaging.
5.7 Office of Risk Management

Responsibilities

–
  • Coordinates with ITS and Executive Leadership to assess business continuity impacts of major incidents.
  • Serves as the liaisonResponsible for institutional cyber liability insurance claims, ensuring required documentation and reporting are completed.
  • Provides guidance on risk transfer, mitigation, and recovery planning for incidents with financial or operational exposure.
  • Ensures that incident response actions are aligned with the university’s overall enterprise risk management framework. Serves as the liaison for institutional cyber liability insurance claims, ensuring required documentation and reporting are completed.  

Authority

  • AuthorizedGeneral Counsel – Responsible for advising on legal, regulatory, contractual, evidentiary, and notification obligations related to initiatecybersecurity cyberincidents. insuranceCoordinates claimlegal processesreview inof collaborationexternal with ITScommunications and Legalbreach Counsel.
  • notification
  • Candeterminations requirewhere ITSapplicable. and other units to provide documentation supporting claims or business continuity assessments.
  • Advises Executive Leadership on broader risk implications and recovery options.
5.8
University Police Department (UPD)

Responsibilities

  • ServeUniversity asCommunications primary– law-enforcement liaisonResponsible for allcoordinating Categorypublic, 1campus-wide, media-facing, or 2stakeholder incidentscommunications involvingrelated suspectedto criminalcybersecurity activityincidents, orin data theft.
  • Coordinatecoordination with the FBIExecutive CyberResponse TaskCoordinator, ForceGeneral for federal involvement.
  • Establish official case numberCounsel, and maintainapplicable chain-of-custodyuniversity documentationleadership. for evidence collected.
  • Secure physical and digital evidence locations as needed.

Authority

  • May restrict or seize affected university equipment for forensic purposes.
  • Authorize the transfer of evidence to federal law enforcement.
  • Collaborate with Legal Counsel, CIO, and CISO to ensure compliance with investigative requirements.
5.9 Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI – Jonesboro Cyber Task Force)

Responsibilities

  • Advise ITS and UPD on response to significant cybercrime, ransomware, or data-theft events.
  • Provide intelligence, indicators of compromise (IOCs), and guidance on federal reporting requirements.
  • Coordinate with university Legal Counsel and UPD on secure evidence transfer.

Authority

  • Request evidence or logs as part of an active investigation.
  • Does not supersede university containment or recovery actions necessary to protect operations.

6. Security Panel Composition

The A-State security panel is comprised of all members of the ITS Senior Leadership and senior members of the IT Security team. This composition ensures that every area is represented in the incident response process and that technical staff from every area are at the disposal of the panel during remedial efforts. This includes:  
  • Chief Information Officer (CIO) 
  • Director of IT Security 
  • Assistant Vice Chancellor of IT Infrastructure and Operations 
  • Assistant Vice Chancellor/ERP Systems 
  • Director of Hardware and Communication Services 
  • Senior Director of Academic Technology and Data Analytics 
  • Budget Director 
  • Senior IT Security Analyst 
  • Security Operations Center Coordinator 

7. Incident Response Stages

A-State follows a multi-stage incident response process to ensure potential incidents are appropriately vetted and verified before technical resources are assigned to remedial actions. These stages are: 
  • Identification and Confirmation 
  • Assessment 
  • Containment 
  • Eradication and Recovery 
  • Post-ReviewIncident ChecklistActivity 
Given the wide variety of cybersecurity incidents that can occur in an enterprise environment and the need for a concise, easy to follow plan during an incident, these stages will not contain step by step instructions for each potential incident category.  

8. Incident Categories and Severity

Incident – Per the Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014 (FISMA), as codified at 44 U.S.C. § 3552(b)(2): An occurrence that (A) actually or imminently jeopardizes, without lawful authority, the integrity, confidentiality, or availability of information or an information system; or (B) constitutes a violation or imminent threat of violation of law, security policies, security procedures, or acceptable use policies. 

Major Incident – Per the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Memorandum M-20-04 or subsequent memo, a major incident is either: 

  1.  Any incident that is likely to result in demonstrable harm to the national security interests, foreign relations, or the economy of the United States or to the public confidence, civil liberties, or public health and safety of the American people.40 Agencies should determine the level of impact of the incident by using the existing incident management process established in the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication (SP) 900-61 Revision 2, Computer Security Incident Handling Guide. 

or, 

  1. A breach that involves personally identifiable information (PII) that, if exfiltrated, modified, deleted, or otherwise compromised, is likely to result in demonstrable harm to the national security interests, foreign relations, or the economy of the United States, or to the public confidence, civil liberties, or public health and safety of the American people. Major incident determination is required for breaches involving PII of 100,000 or more people. 

Breach – Per OMB Memorandum M-17-12 or subsequent memo: The loss of control, compromise, unauthorized disclosure, unauthorized acquisition, or any similar occurrence where (1) a person other than an authorized user accesses or potentially accesses personally identifiable information or (2) an authorized user accesses or potentially accesses personally identifiable information for other than authorized purpose. 

Event – Per NIST SP 900-61 Revision 2: An event is any observable occurrence in a system or network. 

Vulnerabilities: 

  • Internal discovery of potential compromise leveraging a vulnerability 
  • Known exploitation of vulnerability (NVD tagged entries; wide-spread public reporting; viable proof-of-concept exploit released, etc.) 

Incident severity will be directly correlated with the classification of the impacted data and the number of users impacted.  

Data Classification Tier Examples Alternate User Impacted Tier Incident Severity 
Public Websites and public research 1-250 Low 
Internal Internal memos or procedures 251-2,500 Medium 
Confidential FERPA records, personnel files 2,501-10,000 High 
Regulated HIPAA,PCI,CJIS,GLBA 10,001+ Critical 

 


 9. Identification and Confirmation Stage

Upon receipt of an alert or report of a suspected cybersecurity incident, the notified staff should convey all relevant information to the IT security team (security@astate.edu) for review. During this review, the IT security team will work to confirm the validity of the incident and take the following action(s): 

  • False Positive Report 
    • Proceed with standard internal procedures depending on the reported incident. Consult with the Director of IT Security if no internal procedure exists. 
    • Security panel will not be notified of false positive reports.  
  • True Positive or Unconfirmed Report 
    • Escalate the reported incident to the Director of IT Security. If the reported incident is still confirmed as true positive or cannot be confirmed as a false positive, the security panel will be notified and convene for assessment and remediation. 
    • If a reported incident is in the unconfirmed category, it will be treated as a true positive incident by the security panel until otherwise proven false. 

When reporting a true positive or unconfirmed report to the security panel, the following information should be provided to expedite the assessment stage: 

  • What was the initial attack vector?  
  • Is the threat actor exploiting vulnerabilities to achieve access or privilege?  
  • Does the threat actor have persistence on the network or device?  
  • What accounts have been compromised and what privilege level do they have? 
  • Is this an on-premises, vendor driven, or hybrid incident?  

10. Assessment Stage

Following the confirmation of a true positive cybersecurity incident, the security panel will be notified and convene to complete an assessment. This assessment will help to gauge the scope of impact and to identify which technical staff need to be allocated to incident containment and eradication / recovery. During this assessment, the following information will be determined:  

  • System(s) impacted? 
  • Is the incident stable, or is the scope continuing to grow?  
  • What data classification(s) are impacted or at risk? See Data Classification Policy for assistance with identification.  
  • What campus service(s) are degraded?  
  • Which technical staff are critical to incident containment?  

Prior to moving into the containment phase, the Executive Response Coordinator will notify, at a minimum, the Office of Risk Management to ensure cyber liability insurance requirements are met. Unless otherwise necessary, the CIO will serve as the Executive Response Coordinator. 

The final step of the assessment stage is to identify an appropriate Incident Response Coordinator based on the specific details of the incident. Generally, the Director of IT Security will serve in this capacity, but specific incident circumstances may make another member of the Security Panel a more suitable candidate.  


11. Containment Stage

Following a thorough assessment of the reported cybersecurity incident, the Incident Response Coordinator will begin to leverage all available resources (Security Panel members, technical staff, IT Security team members, etc.) to begin the containment stage. The primary objective of this stage is to prevent further damage to institutional resources and reduce the immediate impact of the incident. The specific approach to containment will vary depending on the type of incident.  
Ensure that the containment scope encompasses all related incidents and activity—especially all adversary activity. If new signs of compromise are found, return to the assessment stage to re-scope the incident. Upon successful containment (i.e., no new signs of compromise), preserve evidence for reference or law enforcement investigation, adjust detection tools, and move to eradication and recovery. 
Parallel to the containment activities led by the Incident Response Coordinator, the Executive Response Coordinator will be expected to provide an initial communication to campus or other relevant stakeholders regarding the incident (if appropriate at this stage). 

12. Eradication and Recovery Stage

Once the incident is sufficiently contained, the eradication and recovery stage of the IRP can be executed by the Incident Response Coordinator. Prior to any actions being taken in this stage, ensure that evidence will not be compromised by remedial actions and that law enforcement or commercial vendors have been coordinated with.  
The objective of this stage is to allow the return of normal operations by eliminating artifacts of the incident (e.g., remove malicious code, re-image infected systems) and mitigating the vulnerabilities or other conditions that were exploited. Before moving to eradication, ensure that all means of persistent access into the network have been accounted for, that the adversary activity is sufficiently contained, and that all evidence has been collected. This is often an iterative process and is possible that eradication and recovery actions can be executed simultaneously.  
To validate normal operations have resumed, consider performing an independent test or review of compromise/response-related activity. To help detect related attacks, review cyber threat intelligence (including network situational awareness), and closely monitor the environment for evidence of threat actor activity. 

13. Post Incident Activity Stage

Following the closure of any incident, ITSthe security panel must complete a post-incident review process to capture lessons learned, identify improvements, and ensure preventivepreventative measures are implemented.  

While ITS, specifically the Chief Information Security Officer (CISO), is ultimately responsible for formalizing any final documentation established, the post-mortem review will be initiated and coordinated by ITS in conjunction with, at a minimum, the Security Panel. Depending on the severity and impact of the incident, feedback and input from other constituent groups listed in Section 5 (Notifications & Communications) will also be incorporated as appropriate.

The following checklist should be addressed and documented for every incident: 

    1. Policy Gaps – Could an additional policy have prevented the incident? 

    1. Policy/Procedure Compliance – Was a policy or procedure not followed, enabling the incident? What steps can be taken to ensure compliance going forward? 

    1. Response Effectiveness – Was the incident response appropriate and timely?timely? How could the response process be improved? 

    1. Communication Timeliness – Were all appropriate parties informed in a timely manner?manner? 

    1. Procedure Adequacy – Did the documented incident response procedures cover the full scope of the situation? 

    1. Remediation Actions – Have corrective actions been implementedimplemented? (e.g.,

      patching systems, tightening configurations, password resets, updating anti-virus, refining email policies)?
    1. Prevention of Recurrence – Have changes been made to prevent a similar or related incident in the future? 

    1. Follow-Up Plan – Has a follow-up plan or assessment been established,established, and are responsibilities and timelines documented? 

    1. Risk Management – Was Office of Risk Management notified for assessment of financial/reputational impact and insurance coverage? 



7.14. Standards Review

This plan will be reviewed annually by the CIO, CISO, and ITS Security Panel, or sooner if significant changes occur to technology, organizational structure, or applicable regulations.

Effective Date: September 17,17, 20252025 
Next Review Date: SeptemberJune 17,29, 20262027 
Version: 1.62.0 

Referenced Policies, Standards, and Procedures: 


Appendix A – Security Panel Contact List

  • Chris
    –870-253-9417
  • Patrick
  • Himaja Balakrishnan – 870-897-6184
  • Chris Doyle – 870-578-7838
  • Heather Boothman – 870-930-8184
  • Jake Yandell
  • Shane Johnston
  • Ken Anderson – 870-761-7059
  • Eric Barnett
  • Shivani Payyavula – 870-627-8495
  • Security Panel Contact List 

    Christopher Boothman –

    CIO 

    870-253-8184 

  • Jennifer

    Harrell
  • Jeffrey – 870-680-2110
  • Jacob Weaver

  •  
  • Director of IT Security 

    870-680-4259 

    Himaja Balakrishnan 

    Assistant Vice Chancellor of IT Infrastructure and Operations 

    870-972-3840 

    Deanna Warren 

    Assistant Vice Chancellor/ERP Systems 

    870-972-3033 

    Scott Wheat 

    Director of Hardware and Communication Services 

    870-972-3033 

    Justin Carothers 

    Senior Director of Academic Technology and Data Analytics 

    870-680-8332 

    Vanessa Williams 

    Budget Director 

    870-680-4128 

    Chase Roberson –

    870-514-9553

    Senior IT Security Analyst 

    870-868-1867 

    Kelsie McDole 

    Security Operations Center Coordinator 

    870-680-4273 

    Law Enforcement Contacts:
    Contact List
     

    University Police Department (UPD): 870-972-2093 (24/7 Dispatch)
     

    FBI – Jonesboro Resident Agency (Cyber Task Force): 870-932-0700
     

    Jonesboro Police Department (viathrough UPD)UPD coordination): 870-935-5551 


    Appendix B – IT Security Incident Report

    Date of Report: ____   Prepared By: ____   Incident Date: ____

    1. Executive Summary

    Brief overview of the incident, severity, and outcome.

    2. Incident Overview & Key Timestamps

    Identify severity (IRP category), affected assets/data, and critical timestamps (detection, containment, recovery).

    3. Initial Indicators

    Describe type, initial vector, and IOCs/IOAs.

    4. Containment & Mitigation Actions

    Document containment steps, approvals, and responsible parties.

    5. Evidence Log & Chain of Custody

    Record all collected evidence with dates, handlers, and transfers to ensure integrity and a clear chain of custody (if applicable). If UPD/FBI notified, list contact name, agency, and case number obtained.

    6. Notifications & Communications

    List all internal/external notifications with times and methods.

    7. Root Cause Analysis

    Summarize underlying vulnerabilities, process gaps, or third-party issues.

    8. Timeline of Events
    Date Event Description
    ENTER DATE ENTER TEXT
    ENTER DATE ENTER TEXT
    ENTER DATE ENTER TEXT
    9. Lessons Learned

    Document what worked, what didn’t, and improvement areas.

    10. Recommendations

    List technical and procedural remediation items.

    11. Review & Approval

    Sign-offs by CIO/CISO and Risk Management (if applicable).


    Appendix C – Responsibility Matrix

    Purpose: This matrix provides a concise execution view for incident responders and approvers.

    Legend: R = Responsible  •  A = Accountable  •  C = Consulted  •  I = Informed

    Activity / Phase (from IRP)CIOCISOPanelLegalCommsExecRiskVendorUPDFBI
    Maintain IRP and contacts; resource enablementARCCCCCCII
    Incident intake and initial notification/loggingIA/RRIIIIIII
    Initial assessment and status (in progress? scope?)IA/RRCIIIIII
    Incident categorization (Cat 1–4)IA/RCCIIIIII
    Legal and compliance notifications decisioningICCA/RIICIII
    Law-enforcement trigger decisionCA/RCCIIIICC
    External notifications (who/when)ICCA/RCIIIRR
    Containment actions (isolate, disable, block)IARIIIICCC
    Evidence preservation and chain of custodyIARCIICCA/RC
    Forensics and root cause (logs, imaging)IARCIIICCC
    Eradication and recovery authorizationAA/RCIIIICII
    Eradication and recovery execution (rebuilds, resets, hardening, patches)IARIIIICII
    Validate clean state and return to serviceARRIIIICII
    Documentation (Incident Identification Form, evidence retention)IARCIICICC
    Impact and cost assessmentCA/RCCICCCII
    Communications and follow-up plan (audiences, cadence)CRCCA/RCIIII
    Lessons learned (≤ 30 days) and procedure updatesIA/RRCCCICCC
    Annual plan review (or on significant change)ARCCCCICII