Delta Sources and Resources
154
Arkansas Review 56.2 (August 2025)
The University of Arkansas
Virtual Museum
Online Resource
Virtual Museum
Online Resource
http://sdc.cast.uark.edu
by Marcus Charles Tribbett
The University of Arkansas Virtual Museum
is an online project jointly created and main-
tained by the Center for Advanced Spatial Tech-
nologies (CAST) that features a number of 3D
models of artifacts from the collections of the Ar-
kansas Archaeological Survey (ARAS) and the
University of Arkansas Museum. Some 210 arti-
facts, cataloged by year of acquisition and
number (Accession Number), have been digitized
and are viewable and manipulable in the Gallery
section of the website.
The virtual museum is of interest mainly to
archaeology researchers, teachers, and aficiona-
dos who wish to virtually examine clay pots,
tools, and artwork of the indigenous cultures of
the region, particularly the Mississippian (with
representative samples of Carden Bottoms Phase
pottery and other Caddoan finds, for example).
However, there are also some artifacts that repre-
sent paleo-historical cultures as well as some
much more recent material culture.
The object viewer allows users to adjust light-
ing, fully rotate the object to observe from all an-
gles, zoom in and out, and find measurements.
The surface layer of the digital scan can also be
removed so that details emerge that may be ob-
scured by the original coloration and decoration
or the discoloration and degradation caused by
time and damage: incised and carved marks on
some objects are thus more easily seen.
One drawback to the site is the minimal
description of the artifacts. However, multiple
searchable fields from a pulldown menu for each
entry do provide some historical and cultural
context. Following a brief descriptive name, each
entry has a field for “Cultural Affiliation,” “Geo-
graphical Region,” Time Range,” and “Reposi-
tory.” For instance, item number 1927-5-37 is a
“Bottle, teapot, Ceramic” from the Carden Bot-
toms Phase in the Arkansas River Valley circa AD
1500-1700 and held by the UA museum. The col-
lection can be filtered by these fields as well. One
caveat: not all fields are complete for every arti-
fact. Still, there is enough summary information
for most entries for the feature to be useful.
An advantage of the virtual museum is that
many of the indigenous artifacts included have
been repatriated to descendant communities and
are displayed on the website by permission of
these descendant groups. By making them avail-
able virtually, professional and amateur research-
ers may centrally view objects of initial interest
that otherwise could be difficult to examine with-
out travel and permission to see them. In times
of shrinking research and travel budgets, this
benefit is especially important.
While the project is in its early stages, the
website briefly discusses planned expansions to
the virtual museum, such as adding additional
pages with more contextual information and
linking newly scanned objects to specific projects
and educational initiatives. While by no means
a vast database at this point, the Virtual Museum
shows great promise for future growth. Even at
its current modest size, researchers and teachers
will find value in the resource. Let us hope it con-
tinues to expand. sts
Delta Sources and Resources